Global Memory ranking

1. 1Rank 1Nomi90.3C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Nomi reads strongest on delayed recall and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 74/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • delayed recall 94/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 74/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
2. 2Rank 2Kindroid89.3C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Kindroid reads strongest on delayed recall and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 71/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • delayed recall 93/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 71/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
3. 3Rank 3Paradot77.7C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Paradot reads strongest on memory controls and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 62/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • memory controls 83/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 62/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
4. 4Rank 4Replika74.7C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Replika reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 68/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • conversation quality 85/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 68/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
5. 5Rank 5Character.AI73.9C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Character.AI reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: memory controls scored 68/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 89/1002026-08-15
   • memory controls 68/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
6. 6Rank 6Zeta72.5C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Zeta reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 65/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 87/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 65/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
7. 7Rank 7Lovey Dovey70.9C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Lovey Dovey reads strongest on emotional response and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 62/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • emotional response 87/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 62/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
8. 8Rank 8Talkie70.6C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Talkie reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: memory controls scored 67/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 78/1002026-08-15
   • memory controls 67/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
9. 9Rank 9boyfrnd68.6C/O Score

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset boyfrnd reads strongest on emotional response and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 62/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • emotional response 81/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 62/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   Why it ranksVisit app ↗
10. 10Rank 10bada67.5C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset bada reads strongest on local-language performance and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: memory controls scored 56/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • local-language performance 75/1002026-08-15
    • memory controls 56/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
11. 11Rank 11PolyBuzz67.1C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset PolyBuzz reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: memory controls scored 61/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 75/1002026-08-15
    • memory controls 61/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
12. 12Rank 12Crack66.1C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Crack reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 64/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • narrative continuity 81/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 64/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
13. 13Rank 13sikiji65.3C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset sikiji reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on conversation quality under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: conversation quality scored 62/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 75/1002026-08-15
    • conversation quality 62/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
14. 14Rank 14wishwell64.6C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset wishwell reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 61/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 80/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 61/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
15. 15Rank 15morewhere64C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset morewhere reads strongest on relationship continuity and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 54/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • relationship continuity 70/1002026-08-15
    • character fidelity 54/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
16. 16Rank 16dolcall63.8C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset dolcall reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on narrative continuity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: narrative continuity scored 55/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • conversation quality 74/1002026-08-15
    • narrative continuity 55/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
17. 17Rank 17Cotomo62.6C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Cotomo reads strongest on local-language performance and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 60/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • local-language performance 71/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 60/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
18. 18Rank 18Loverse61.2C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Loverse reads strongest on relationship continuity and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 50/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • relationship continuity 69/1002026-08-15
    • character fidelity 50/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
19. 19Rank 19Janitor AI61C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Janitor AI reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 56/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • narrative continuity 77/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 56/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
20. 20Rank 20befall60.6C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset befall reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on session continuity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: session continuity scored 59/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 76/1002026-08-15
    • session continuity 59/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
21. 21Rank 21EVA AI58.8C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset EVA AI reads strongest on emotional response and weakest on narrative initiative under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: narrative initiative scored 50/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • emotional response 68/1002026-08-15
    • narrative initiative 50/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
22. 22Rank 22Anima58.6C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Anima reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on narrative initiative under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: narrative initiative scored 54/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • conversation quality 72/1002026-08-15
    • narrative initiative 54/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗
23. 23Rank 23Chai58.4C/O Score

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Chai reads strongest on narrative initiative and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 53/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • narrative initiative 74/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 53/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    Why it ranksVisit app ↗