직접 테스트해 순위를 매긴 최고의 AI 컴패니언 앱

1. 11위Nomi80.3C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Nomi reads strongest on relationship continuity and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 71/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • relationship continuity 92/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 71/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
2. 22위Character.AI77.6C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Character.AI reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • narrative continuity 86/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
3. 33위Zeta77.2C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Zeta reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 67/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • narrative continuity 88/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 67/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
4. 44위Kindroid76.7C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Kindroid reads strongest on delayed recall and weakest on local-language performance under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: local-language performance scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • delayed recall 93/1002026-08-15
   • local-language performance 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
5. 55위Replika74.9C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Replika reads strongest on boundary and recovery handling and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: memory controls scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • boundary and recovery handling 80/1002026-08-15
   • memory controls 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
6. 66위Lovey Dovey73.8C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Lovey Dovey reads strongest on emotional response and weakest on narrative initiative under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: narrative initiative scored 65/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • emotional response 85/1002026-08-15
   • narrative initiative 65/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
7. 77위Talkie72.9C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Talkie reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 66/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 83/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 66/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗