한국 에디션 가격 대비 순위

1. 11위Character.AI80.3C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Character.AI reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • narrative continuity 86/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
2. 22위Nomi79.4C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Nomi reads strongest on relationship continuity and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 71/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • relationship continuity 92/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 71/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
3. 33위Zeta76.6C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Zeta reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 67/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • narrative continuity 88/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 67/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
4. 44위Kindroid74.8C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Kindroid reads strongest on delayed recall and weakest on local-language performance under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: local-language performance scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • delayed recall 93/1002026-08-15
   • local-language performance 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
5. 55위Replika74.4C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Replika reads strongest on boundary and recovery handling and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: memory controls scored 70/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • boundary and recovery handling 80/1002026-08-15
   • memory controls 70/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
6. 66위Lovey Dovey74.1C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Lovey Dovey reads strongest on emotional response and weakest on narrative initiative under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: narrative initiative scored 65/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • emotional response 85/1002026-08-15
   • narrative initiative 65/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
7. 77위Crack74C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Crack reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on memory controls under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: memory controls scored 65/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 79/1002026-08-15
   • memory controls 65/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
8. 88위boyfrnd71.9C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset boyfrnd reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 66/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • conversation quality 80/1002026-08-15
   • character fidelity 66/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
9. 99위wishwell71C/O 점수

   Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset wishwell reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

   Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 60/100 in the staging scenario set.

   • character fidelity 81/1002026-08-15
   • delayed recall 60/1002026-08-15
   • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
   순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
10. 1010위Talkie70.9C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Talkie reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 66/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 83/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 66/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
11. 1111위Paradot70.5C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Paradot reads strongest on memory controls and weakest on local price stability under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: local price stability scored 65/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • memory controls 83/1002026-08-15
    • local price stability 65/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
12. 1212위sikiji68.2C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset sikiji reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on conversation quality under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: conversation quality scored 62/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 78/1002026-08-15
    • conversation quality 62/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
13. 1313위Cotomo67.9C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Cotomo reads strongest on product reliability and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 59/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • product reliability 73/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 59/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
14. 1414위bada67.6C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset bada reads strongest on local-language performance and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 58/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • local-language performance 81/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 58/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
15. 1515위PolyBuzz67.5C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset PolyBuzz reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 60/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 80/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 60/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
16. 1616위Janitor AI64.3C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Janitor AI reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 58/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 79/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 58/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
17. 1717위dolcall63.9C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset dolcall reads strongest on local-language performance and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 56/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • local-language performance 72/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 56/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
18. 1818위befall62.1C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset befall reads strongest on character fidelity and weakest on contradiction resistance under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: contradiction resistance scored 60/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • character fidelity 77/1002026-08-15
    • contradiction resistance 60/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
19. 1919위morewhere61.8C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset morewhere reads strongest on local-language performance and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 51/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • local-language performance 71/1002026-08-15
    • character fidelity 51/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
20. 2020위Chai60.8C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Chai reads strongest on narrative continuity and weakest on delayed recall under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: delayed recall scored 55/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • narrative continuity 71/1002026-08-15
    • delayed recall 55/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
21. 2121위Loverse56.9C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Loverse reads strongest on narrative initiative and weakest on paid experience per cost under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: paid experience per cost scored 52/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • narrative initiative 67/1002026-08-15
    • paid experience per cost 52/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
22. 2222위Anima56.3C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset Anima reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on narrative initiative under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: narrative initiative scored 49/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • conversation quality 67/1002026-08-15
    • narrative initiative 49/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗
23. 2323위EVA AI55C/O 점수

    Illustrative preview: in this staging dataset EVA AI reads strongest on conversation quality and weakest on character fidelity under methodology v0.1.

    Illustrative record: character fidelity scored 49/100 in the staging scenario set.

    • conversation quality 70/1002026-08-15
    • character fidelity 49/1002026-08-15
    • 14-day scenario set, paid-standard tier2026-08-15
    순위 근거앱으로 이동 ↗